nealeh o wells
our appeasement of art 2002

our individual humanity brings our attention to what we now call art. where we once used marks to prevail our independence communication of sight we now feel obliged to question its existence..
what is art? why do we prevail with that single question, a secondary question to the answer...where we deliver art we deliver perception, our land is developed through the ways we find and discover, directions from the passive points that has form. you believe in what you see, you believe in what you don't, our detection or dejection of what we know is explained by our brilliance as a human. we have the power to change, we also have the obligation to change yet the stagnated echo of 'what is' reduces our nature to a form of covert intellect. the real division of our communications is to bring our attention, to explore the difference and remain in control. we judge ours peers on the outcome yet our peers are judged by time. our allowance of the world can be portrayed today yet our lucidity will only be seen tomorrow. the deafening chorus of change will be resented by those who follow conservatism, its field will not allow those who demand answers to be force fed the answers for questions they do not know. the appeasement process started when humans decided to inherit a value that adopts no strength or direction. the voice that shows a result will belong to the way we conduct ourselves..
the cleansing of art galleries should produce a better understanding of art. we don't allow the transient process to continue as it should. our thoughts are with these that mention death. our intellect is with those that choose to persuade its future to hold our thoughts and perhaps the day with 'outing' our chance for change..